Assignment 1
The purpose of this assignment is to provide students
with experience in performing a guided expert evaluation of the
usability of an existing system.
Students will select an e-Commerce Web site and evaluate it
based on the principles contained in Chapter 4 of the class text.
Steps in completing this assignment:
- Identify a suitably
complex e-Commerce web site that sells a variety of products.
- Check that it has not
already been listed in the list of approved Web sites for use by another student.
- E-mail a request to use
this web site to the instructor: carter @ cs . usask . ca
- Make sure that your request has as its subject: CAP 4104 Web site claim request.
- Make sure to both name and provide a link to the site.
- Make sure to include your name with your request.
- Check to see that the
instructor has approved your use of the site.
- Approved requests will be
posted in the list of approved Web sites.
- The instructor
will attempt to provide feedback on web pages that are not approved as
soon as possible.
NOTE 1: it is good to get started on selecting a
site as soon as possible.
NOTE 2: amazon.com and ebay.com are not eligible for
being selected.
NOTE 3: be sure to consider how well a site will work
for doing this assignment. I.e. you want a site that has both good and bad
elements in its design and that is complicated enough to identify a number of different
good and bad elements.
- Apply the principles from
Chapter 4.3 of the class text to identify examples of where they have been
successfully applied and where they might suggest opportunities for
improvements.
- You must have a minimum
of 20 examples in total,
- 10 examples of good applications of principles
- 10 examples of bad applications of
NOTE 1: each example must be significantly different
from the others. Examples that are deemed to be redundant will not receive
marks.
NOTE 2: If you include additional ones, you will
receive marks for the best examples, provided that they meet the remaining
criteria (below).
- You must use at least 5
of the 11 principles from Chapter 4.3, and each principle must have a
minimum of 2 examples to be counted as being used.
- Develop a well-structured
and well-written report (in a Word (.doc or .docx) or pdf format) or of your evaluation. Each example needs to include:
- identification and explanation of the example
- an identification number of each example (that can be used by the marker to refer to examples in your assignment)
- a short descriptive name
for the example
- the url of the page that
contains the example
- a short description of
the what was found on the page (with a screen capture where needed to
understand what was found in any page that was dynamically created and
that might not be able to be revisited)
- discussion of the principle it relates to (see text chapter 4.3)
- identification of principle that it is
a good or bad example of and whether it is a good or bad example
- a short discussion of
either:
- for good examples: why it is an example of the principle being
successfully applied
- for bad examples: what improvement the principle suggests should
be made
- evaluation of the significance of this example (see text chapter 4.4.1.2)
- your rating of how good or bad an example it is
- a brief discussion of why you would give it this rating
- Submit your assignment
electronically via WebCourses by 12:00 noon on Monday Feb. 6.
- Late assignments will not be accepted.
- Assignments not submitted before 12:00 noon EST on Monday Feb 6, 2012 will automatically receive a mark of 0.
- Assignments must be submitted as a single Word or pdf file.
NOTE: Do not leave this too
long and do not expect any extensions. If necessary it is better to submit an
incomplete assignment than not to submit anything.
Marking Structure
20
distinct examples are required.
- Examples that are too similar to other
examples that have been given marks, will not also be given marks.
- If you provide more than 20 examples, the marks of the best 20 will be used, provided that they meet the constraints below.
For each example the following marking will be used:
- {0 or 1 or 2 marks} for the identification and explanation of the example
- 2 marks for very good to excellent quality work
- 1 mark for adequate quality work
- 0 marks for unacceptable quality work
- {0 or 1 or 2 marks} for your discussion of the principle it relates to
- 2 marks for very good to excellent quality work
- 1 mark for adequate quality work
- 0 marks for unacceptable quality work
- {0 or 1 mark} for your evaluation of the significance of the example
- 1 mark for good to excellent quality work
- 0 marks for unacceptable quality work
NOTE: The following constraints will be placed on the marks:
- a maximum of 10 good examples will receive marks
- a maximum of 10 bad examples will receive marks
- if
there are not 5 different principles represented in the examples that
receive marks, then the maximum examples that can receive marks will be
decreased by 4 examples per missing principle (e.g. if only 3
principles are involved then the maximum number of examples to receive
marks will be 12 rather than 20)