Assignment 2
This is the final version of Assignment 2 that was formally assigned in class on Feb. 7,
2012.
The purpose of this
assignment is to
provide students
with experience in performing user testing of the
usability of an existing system.
It is also intended to provide students with experience in finding
information beyond that presented in class on how to apply usability
methods.
Students will use the e-Commerce Web
site that they used for Assignment 1 and evaluate it via user testing.
NOTE: If you have not
completed Assignment 1, you will be unable to complete step 5 d below.
Steps in completing this assignment:
- Plan your user testing
- your test goals,
- how you will
conduct the user tests
- how you will
collect and evaluate the results, including
- performance
measures
- observing
the use
- follow up
questions
NOTE 1: This should involve your
finding out more
about user testing on your own, beyond what is presented in the class
and the
text. The instructor will not provide references - it is part of the
assignment for the students to identify suitable sources of information
on user testing.
NOTE 2: If you have any other
specific questions about
this assignment, be sure to ask them as soon as possible.
- Identify and develop descriptions
of what you will be testing, this will involve
- a minimum of 3
different tasks that a user could perform on the web site
NOTE: It is ideal for you to
evaluate as many
different tasks as possible, but while it would be nice to
include more
scenarios, it is important that all scenarios can be completed in a
maximum of
between 30 and 45 minutes of user testing.
- a minimum of 5
distinctly different scenarios (which are what you actually will be
testing)
- there
must be at least two distinct scenarios for at least one of the tasks.
NOTE 1: The descriptions of the
scenarios should focus
on what needs to be done rather than how to do it, so that you can give
these
scenarios to test subjects and use them to see how they try and
accomplish them
with the web site.
NOTE 2:
For scenarios to be of use, you need to identify in advance each of the
logical steps that must be accomplished in order to successfully
accomplish the scenario, whether or not you choose to provide this
information to your test subjects.
NOTE 3: Any scenario that involves
attempting to
purchase a product should not actually involve submitting a bogus or
real order
to the owner of the web site, but it has to involve sufficient
interactions up
to the point of submitting an order to allow sufficient testing to
determine
relevant usability issues.
- Recruit a minimum of 4
individuals to test the web site for you. You need to
obtain informed consent from each of them to participate. This informed
consent should include your explaining:
- The purpose of
your user test and the procedure that you will be using
- Any potential
benefits and risks that they might receive from their participation
- Their right to
withdraw from the user test at any point during the test
- How you will
protect their identity (e.g. confidentiality of any published results)
NOTE 1: You should select your
participants to
represent a wide range of possible user characteristics. You will be
expected
to report the characteristics that apply to each user, but not the
names or
other personally identifying information about them. You should also
consider
how these characteristics relate to results in your analysis of results.
NOTE 2: You may not use students
from this class as
participants in your usability tests.
- Individually conduct the user
tests according to your plans.
NOTE 1: Do not wait too long to
complete this, there
is still a lot to do after the tests are completed.
NOTE 2: If you do not get useful
results from an
individual test subject, you should recruit an additional test subject
and
conduct an additional test so that you have 4 sets of useful results.
- Develop a well-structured and
well-written report of your user testing, with the
following sections:
- The
planning and conducting of the testing, including:
- Your
plan for the testing (from step 1 above)
NOTE: You should formally
acknowledge, with suitable academic references, the sources of
information that helped you with constructing this plan
- Descriptions of the tasks and scenarios
(from step 2 above) and discussions of how you will obtain the measures you chose to observe / measure during
the testing (including any that will be asked in a pre-testing and/or a follow-up
interview/questionnaire).
NOTE: This should include the
actual wording of the scenarios that you provided to your research
participants and any testing or interview scripts / questionnaires used
- Brief
descriptions of the characteristics of
each of your research participants, without actually identifying them.
(from step 3 above)
- A
brief discussion of how the testing was
conducted and any changes to your initial plans that you had to make.
- A brief discussion of how you analyzed / evaluated the results.
- The
results of the testing. Results are objective statements of
what measures you obtained from the testing. They should be presented on their own without any
personal discussions from the person doing the testing.
- The
analysis of the results. Analysis of results where you
comment on what you think the results mean and what should be done
about them.
- What
you have learned about the differences between user testing and expert
evaluations. This should start with a comparison of your
results from this user testing with the results from the expert
evaluation you conducted in Assignment 1. But it needs to go beyond
presenting this comparison of results to include an analysis of what
this means to you.
- Submit your
assignment electronically via WebCourses by 12:00 noon on Monday Feb.
27.
- Late assignments
will not be accepted.
- Assignments not
submitted before 12:00 noon EST on Monday Feb 27, 2012 will
automatically receive a mark of 0.
- Failure to
submit anything for Assignment 2 will also result in an automatic mark
of 0 on Assignment 3.
- Assignments must
be submitted as a single Word or pdf file.
NOTE: This is a time consuming
assignment. Do not leave this too
long and do not expect any extensions. If necessary it is better to
submit an
incomplete assignment than not to submit anything.
Marking Structure
In order to be eligible to receive full marks:
- a minimum of 5 distinct scenarios are required
- a minimum of 4 different test subjects are required
- a minimum of 3 different tasks are required
- Providing less than any of these will reduce the maximum
possible marks in proportion to what is missing.
- If you provide more than the minimum, the best answers will
be used.
The following marking structure will be used:
- Planning and conducting {maximum marks possible = 20,
distributed between 4 components}
- your plan for the testing {maximum marks possible = 5}
- descriptions of tasks and scenarios {maximum marks
possible = 5}
- characteristics of research
participants {maximum
marks possible = 5}
- discussion of conduct of the testing {maximum marks
possible = 5}
NOTE 1: for each of these marks of
{5, 4, 3, 2, 1, or 0} will be assigned depending on the quality and
completeness (in terms of content) of what you have produced.
NOTE 2: the marks on this section of the report are not subject to
being diminished based on the actual testing involving less than the
required minimums.
- Results of testing {maximum marks possible = 30,
distributed as follows}
- results of each of 5 scenarios
{maximum
marks possible per scenario = 5} {total maximum marks possible
= 25}
- for each scenario {1 mark for the results for each of 4
test subjects and 1 mark for the combined results for all test subjects}
- combined results of all scenarios {maximum marks possible
= 5}
- {1 mark for the results for each of 4 test subjects and
1 mark for the combined results for all test subjects}
NOTE: the marks on this section of
the
report are subject to being diminished based on the actual testing
involving less than the required minimums.
- Analysis of results {maximum marks possible = 30,
distributed as follows}
- analysis of results for each scenario {maximum marks
possible per scenario = 5} {total maximum marks possible = 25}
- analysis of results for all scenarios {maximum marks
possible = 5}
NOTE 1: for each of these marks of
{5,
4, 3, 2, 1, or 0} will be assigned depending on the quality and
completeness (in terms of content) of what you have produced.
NOTE
2: the marks on this section of the report are subject to being
diminished based on the actual testing involving less than the required
minimums.
- What you have learned {maximum marks possible = 20,
distributed between 2 components}
- comparison of results from Assignment 1 and Assignment 2
{maximum possible = 10}
- this should include at least 5 significant similarities
or differences
- discussion of what this means to you {maximum possible 10}
- this should include at least 5 significant things that
you have learned
NOTE: each of the significant items
in this section of the report will get {2 or 1 or 0 marks}
2 marks for very good to excellent
quality work
1 mark for adequate quality work
0 marks for unacceptable quality work