Larch/C++ integer constants are exactly the sames as those of C++.
See section 4.6 Identifiers for the lexical syntax of digit
.
integer-constant ::= decimal-constant | octal-constant | hex-constant decimal-constant ::= one-to-nine [ digit ] ... [integer-suffix] one-to-nine ::=1
|2
|3
|4
|5
|6
|7
|8
|9
octal-constant ::=0
[ octal-digit ] ... [integer-suffix] octal-digit ::=0
|1
|2
|3
|4
|5
|6
|7
hex-constant ::=0
hex-indicator hex-digit [ hex-digit ] ... [integer-suffix] hex-indicator ::=x
|X
hex-digit ::= digit |a
|b
|c
|d
|e
|f
|A
|B
|C
|D
|E
|F
integer-suffix ::= long-suffix | unsigned-suffix | long-suffix unsigned-suffix | unsigned-suffix long-suffix long-suffix ::=l
|L
unsigned-suffix ::=u
|U
Some examples of integer-constants follow.
227 228U 0342L 0xFFFFFFFFul
The meaning of an integer-constant is as in C++
(See Section 2.5.1 of [Ellis-Stroustrup90]),
except that the sort of an integer-constant is always int
,
unless a suffix is present.
This makes the specification independent of a particular C++ implementation
of integers.
Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.