About COP 4020
This page provides general information about the Fall 2007 offering of COP 4020 at the University of Central Florida. The course's home page is http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/~leavens/COP4020/.
This page is organized as follows:
- Meetings
- Course Textbooks
- Computer Accounts
- Accommodations for Disabilities
- Course Description and Credit Hours
- Objectives
- Outcomes
- Prerequisites
- Acknowledgments
The course grading policy and syllabus (which includes the time of the final exam) are on separate web pages. Also on a separate page is our contact information.
Meetings
Lecture attendance is required. The meeting time and location is as follows:
Lectures: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, at 10:30AM-11:20AM, in 103 ENG3-116 (Harris Center).
Course Textbooks
There is one required text for the course.
- Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming, by Peter Van Roy and Seif Haridi (MIT Press, 2004).
We will supplement the text with other material as described in the syllabus's bibliography.
Computer Accounts
You should have an account on the Olympus cluster to run software for this course.
See http://www.acs.ucf.edu/documents/handouts/Olympus_Info.pdf for information about the Olympus system. See http://www.acs.ucf.edu/computerlabs.html for the location of various computer labs where you can use Olympus.
Refer to the information discussed in class for Running Oz.
Accommodations for Disabilities
We are happy to help with reasonable accommodations for disabilities. The procedure is outlined in the following statement (quoted from the faculty center for teaching and learning's web site):
"The University of Central Florida is committed to providing reasonable accommodations for all persons with disabilities. This syllabus is available in alternate formats upon request. Students with disabilities who need accommodations in this course must contact the professor at the beginning of the semester to discuss needed accommodations. No accommodations will be provided until the student has met with the professor to request accommodations. Students who need accommodations must be registered with Student Disability Services, Student Resource Center Room 132, phone (407) 823-2371, TTY/TDD only phone (407) 823-2116, before requesting accommodations from the professor."
Course Description and Credit Hours
This 3 credit course is titled "Programming Languages I."
From the University of Central Florida Catalog: "PR: COP 3503C and COT 3960. Paradigms and fundamental concepts of programming languages are presented, including: scope, binding, abstraction, encapsulation, typing etc. Design paradigms object-oriented, functional and logic programming are presented."
Explanation
A programming language can be defined as a language capable of expressing everything computable. Examples include general purpose programming languages, such as AspectJ, Java, Oz, Smalltalk, C, Pascal, Haskell, ML, LISP, COBOL, and FORTRAN, as well as special purpose programming languages like the Unix Shell, Perl, and even Microsoft Excel's macro language.
A paradigm, or programming model, is a way of programming. It deals with ways of thinking about problems and how one organizes solutions.
Motivation for the Course Objectives
The currently most widely-used paradigm is the object-oriented paradigm, which is a sub-paradigm of the procedural paradigm, itself a subparadigm of the imperative paradigm. Since the 1950s when computing first became practical, the imperative paradigm has been the most widely-used.
However, the functional and logic programming (or relational) paradigms have been in use since the 1960s and the 1980s, respectively. Both are part of the declarative paradigm, which does not use assignment statements and mutation. The functional paradigm uses functions as its main organizing principle, including functions that take functions as arguments and return functions as results. The Logic (relational) paradigm uses facts and relationships among facts to organize knowledge, and uses search (with backtracking) for computation. Both these paradigms have significant advantages in some situations.
One advantage of the functional (and declarative) paradigm is that it makes concurrent programming easier. This is one reason that the large telephone company Ericsson uses the functional language Erlang to write all of its software. Functional programming is also a key technology for supporting domain-specific languages. See also Why Functional Programming Matters by John Hughes.
Even if you do not become a programmer, the ideas of the functional paradigm (function abstraction, infinite data structures, continuations, referential transparency) have important applications in all areas of computer science and in many other contexts such as mathematics and engineering.
The ideas of the logic programming paradigm (also known as the relational paradigm) are important in formal methods, especially for specification, and in program analysis and tool building, such as model checking. The key concept of unification is also important for type checking. Moreover, the basic ideas of logic programming are closely related to operational semantics, which is arguably the most important semantic technique for precisely defining programming languages.
Paradigms are supported, to a greater or lesser extent, in particular programming languages. However, features from other paradigms are adopted by languages as they grow older. For example, the procedural languages FORTRAN and COBOL have been extended with object-oriented features, and a similar transformation led from C to C++. The template mechanism of C++ allows programming in a functional style, and there are various packages to extend C++ and Java with features that support logic programming. Thus it is generally possible to program the way you think best suits a problem, in whatever language you use.
Change in programming languages is a fact of professional life in computer science. In addition to changes within a language over time, as the language evolves, the languages in general use also change. Indeed, the currently popular programming language has always changed on a scale of 5-10 years. In the 1970s it was FORTRAN, in the 1980s was Pascal and then C; in the late 1980s and for most of the 1990s it was C++; since the late 1990s it has been Java (or C#). The time seems ripe for another major change, as Java is now over 10 years old and hardware is changing in fundamental ways.
Besides change in languages over long periods of time, today's professionals must cope with changes between languages in their daily work. This is because programmers typically use several different languages on a single project. These include special purpose languages for databases (SQL), web programming (PHP, Perl, C#, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, Python, ASP, etc.), special purpose languages for customization of application software (such as Visual Basic for MS Office).
Therefore, having a career in computer science means having to quickly learn and master new programming languages.
To meet your need to quickly learn new programming languages, and to help you master the languages you do use, this course seeks to provide a forum where you can develop an understanding of the basic concepts and design alternatives that are part of every paradigm and programming language. Things like:
- How does one divide programs into manageable pieces?
- What conceptual models can be used for translating a real world problems into programs?
- What are good ways to express programming idioms?
- What features must a programming language provide?
- What additional features will help simplify things for users?
- What are the performance characteristics of various features?
In addition, we address the question of what paradigms are best suited for different kinds of problems, and what their relative advantages and disadvantages are.
Motivation for the Course Plan
In this offering of COP 4020 we will use the (relatively) new textbook Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming, by Peter Van Roy and Seif Haridi (MIT Press, 2004). This book has an interesting approach to presenting a wide variety of different paradigms, which they call programming models. The book discusses a variety of programming models including: a declarative model, a declarative concurrent model, a message passing concurrency model, an explicit state model, an object-oriented model, a shared-state concurrency model, and a relational model. Several variants are considered. The book not only describes these programming models, it also describes how to program in them. In particular, it has an especially rich discussion of concurrent language features.
All of the paradigms are presented in terms of the Oz language. Oz forms a kernel on which all the other paradigms are built as extensions. Programming in Oz is supported by the Mozart/Oz system.
This offering thus covers the following knowledge units from the Final Report of the Joint ACM/IEEE-CS Task Force on Computing Curricula 2001 for Computer Science: PF4, PL1, PL2, PL4, PL5, PL7, PL8, PL10, PL11, with some coverage of OS3, IS2, and IS3.
Course Learning Objectives
The objectives for this course are divided into two parts: a set of essential objectives, and a set of enrichment objectives. The essential objectives will be helpful for your career as a computer scientist or software engineer; hence they lead to the course's essential outcomes that we want to help you master. The enrichment objectives are less important for the course, but lead to enrichment outcomes that you are encouraged to explore both for their own sake and because learning more about those will help deepen your understanding of the essential objectives.
This course's objectives are linked to the computer science program's learning objectives (in references that look like this: [CSObj2]).
Essential Objectives
In one sentence, this course's main objective is that you will be able to quickly learn and effectively use new programming languages [CSObj2] [CSObj3] and make reasoned judgments about what combinations of paradigm and language features to use to solve a particular problem [CSObj2] [CSObj3]. In more detail the essential objectives for this course are that you will be able to:
- [QuicklyLearn]
Learn a new programming language
in the procedural, object-oriented, declarative (functional), declarative concurrent, message passing, or relational paradigm
within one 40 hour work week well enough to write simple (one-page) programs and to be able to convincingly justify its advantages and disadvantages for solving various kinds of problems
[CSObj2]
[CSObj3].
- [TermsAndConcepts] Correctly explain and use the terms and concepts from the field of programming languages that you encounter when reading reference material about a new language, including: scope, binding, abstraction, encapsulation, parameter passing, typing, etc. [CSObj2] [CSObj3]. (This is an important sub-objective of [QuicklyLearn].)
- [Master] Effectively program such a new language after using it for two months so that you are as productive with it as with any other language [CSObj2] [CSObj3].
- [Evaluate] Evaluate what combination of paradigm and language features would best solve a given problem, including a convincing evaluation of the relative advantages and disadvantages of other options [CSObj2] [CSObj3].
Enrichment Objectives
Enrichment objectives could be multiplied without limit, but the following seem most important, especially in relation to the computer science program's learning objectives.
The course's enrichment objectives are that you will be able to:
- [TeamDesign] Effectively participate in a team designing a new extension language for an application, a new library package, or a new special-purpose language [CSObj1].
- [WriteForEval] Convincingly write about or orally communicate about the advantages and disadvantages of various paradigms, programming language features and programming languages for solving different problems [CSObj2] [CSObj4].
- [CriticalEval] Critically evaluate research in programming models and programming languages [CSObj3] [CSObj4].
- [Apply] Apply the concepts, techniques, and methods of programming and language design in other areas of computer science [CSObj3].
Course Learning Outcomes
This course's learning outcomes are divided into two parts: a set of essential outcomes, and a set of enrichment outcomes. The essential outcomes are designed to support this course's essential objectives, and thus to be helpful for your career as a computer scientist or software engineer; hence we want to help you to master them. They also form the basis for grading and assessment of our teaching. The enrichment outcomes are not used directly for grading and assessment. However, you are encouraged to explore topics related to the enrichment outcomes both for their own sake and because learning more about those will help your performance relative to the essential outcomes.
The course's outcomes are linked to the course's objectives and to the computer science program's outcomes. The links to this course's objectives are shown in references that look like this: [QuicklyLearn]. The links to the computer science program's learning outcomes are shown in references that look like this: [CSOut2]).
Essential Outcomes
In one sentence, this course's main expected learning outcome is that you will be able to convincingly justify the use of various programming models for solving various kinds of problem [QuicklyLearn] [CSOut2] [CSOut5], effectively solve problems in several paradigms [Master] [CSOut2] [CSOut5], and make reasoned judgments about what combinations of paradigm and language features to use to solve a particular problem [Evaluate] [CSOut2] [CSOut5].
To state the essential objectives in more detail, it will be helpful to define the essential programming models (or paradigms) as the following programming models: declarative, declarative concurrent, message passing concurrency, and relational.
With the above definition we can state the essential objectives for this course are that you will be able to:
- [Concepts] Use appropriate terms and concepts to explain the semantics of each essential programming model, be able to apply appropriate terms and concepts to answer questions about the meaning of small programs written in each model, and use appropriate terms and concepts in discussions of programming languages, so that at least 75% of the time these terms and concepts are used and understood correctly [TermsAndConcepts] [QuicklyLearn] [Master] [Evaluate] [CSOut2] [CSOut5].
- [UseModels] Use each essential programming model as realized in the Oz programming language to correctly solve at least 75% of small problems, when told what programming model to use [QuicklyLearn] [Master] [CSOut2] [CSOut5].
- [UseLanguages] Use an essential programming model in C, C++, or Java, to correctly solve at least 75% of small problems restricting your solution to a given programming model [TermsAndConcepts] [Master] [CSOut2] [CSOut5] [CSOut9] [CSOut10].
- [EvaluateModels] For each essential programming model convincingly evaluate its advantages and disadvantages for solving a given programming problem (to the extent that your answer is convincing 75% of the time) [TermsAndConcepts] [Evaluate] [CSOut2] [CSOut5].
- [MapToLanguages] Convincingly explain what features in C, C++, and Java support each essential programming model (to the extent that your answer is convincing 75% of the time) [TermsAndConcepts] [Evaluate] [CSOut2] [CSOut5] [CSOut9] [CSOut10].
Other conditions: You will be permitted to use your own textbook and course notes for all graded quizzes, homeworks, and exams (and assessment).
For purposes of grading (and assessment) a program correctly solves a problem in a given programming model if it only uses features of that programming model, only exhibits minor syntax errors, does not exhibit any maintenance problems (such as repeated code or lack of information hiding), and if the solution is within 25% of the length (counted in non-commentary tokens) and runtime time and space efficiency of the instructor's solution. Of course, there may be many correct solutions to a given problem.
Note that we take points off for syntax errors on exams as a way to make sure that you are doing the homeworks and having the learning experience of doing them. Students who do not do the homework typically make large numbers of syntax errors.
An assessment plan for these outcomes is also available.
Enrichment Outcomes
Enrichment outcomes could be multiplied without limit, but the following seem most important, especially in relation to the computer science program's learning outcomes.
The course's enrichment outcomes are that you will be able to:
- [Tradeoffs] Explain and evaluate the tradeoffs and issues involved in the design of various language features [TermsAndConcepts] [Evaluate] [CSOut3] [CSOut5] [CSOut7].
- [Design] Design, define, and evaluate parts of programming languages or similar systems and justify your design decisions [TermsAndConcepts] [Evaluate] [CSOut7].
- [EvaluateResearch] Find and critically write about research in programming languages. [TermsAndConcepts] [Evaluate] [CriticalEval] [CSOut3] [CSOut7].
- [Writing] Convincingly write about the advantages and disadvantages of various paradigms, programming language features and programming languages for solving different problems [TermsAndConcepts] [Apply] [CSOut4].
Prerequisites
The formal prerequisite in the University of Central Florida catalog is successful completion of both COP 3503C (Computer Science II) and COT 3960 (CS Foundation Exam).
See the professor if you have questions about the prerequisites.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Curtis Clifton (now at Rose-Hulman) for his initial work on the HTML for these web pages, which I have adapted from another course, and his style sheets, which I have also adapted. Thanks to Steve Shaner for getting me to use an RSS feed for these web pages, and thanks to Evagoras Charalambous for the XSL style sheet and style sheet for showing such RSS feeds as a web page.
I thank the many people I have talked to over the years about programming languages, especially Barbara Liskov, David Gifford, Kelvin Nilsen, Markus Lumpe, David Schmidt, Dan Friedman, and the people mentioned in the acknowldegements for Com S 342, which I taught at Iowa State, including the authors of the various textbooks I have used.
Last modified Sunday, October 28, 2007.
This web page is for the Fall 2007 offering of COP 4020 at the University of Central Florida. The details of this course are subject to change as experience dictates. You will be informed of any changes. Please direct any comments or questions to Gary T. Leavens.