Next: Specification of Software Frameworks
Up: 2 Position
Previous: What insights might help
Subsections
One can imagine that a very wide range of parameters are used to instantiate
frameworks. Is this true? Are there common special cases, e.g.,
leaf routines, sequential code fragments?
There are lots of ways that components can be fed into a software framework,
e.g., callbacks, value passing, procedure passing, object passing, inheritance,
macro expansion. How do the semantics of these mechanisms influence
the incorporation of parameter descriptions into framework reasoning?
If so, then we need to be prepared to handle a significantly more complex
reasoning problem than in the purely sequential case.
Furthermore, there may be a need for assessing internal
correctness properties, e.g., deadlock freedom.
The lightweight methods mentioned above all address concurrency
to a certain extent.
It may be the case that concurrency is present, but in a restricted
form. Can the structure of this internal concurrency be
exploited to reduce reasoning cost?
Next: Specification of Software Frameworks
Up: 2 Position
Previous: What insights might help
Matthew B. Dwyer
Sept. 2, 1997